Sigma 50mm f/2.8 EX DG Review
Product overview
- Launch price:
- £320
- Launch date:
- 1st January 2008
- • Full-frame and APS-C
- • 80mm equivalent on APS-C SLR
- • 1:1 reproduction ratio
- • 0.189m minimum focus
Technical Specification
RRP: £320Date released: January 2006
Max format size: Full-frame
Focal length: 50mm
35mm equivalent focal length: 80mm on APS-C D-SLR
Max aperture: f2.8
Minimum aperture: f45 (f32 on Nikon and Pentax mounts)
Construction: 10 elements in 9 groups
Minimum focus: 0.189m
Diaphragm blades: 7
AF motor type: Integral (Canon and Sigma fit only)
Image Stabilization: No
Filter thread: 55mm
Weight: 320g
Dimensions: 71.4 x 66.5mm
Accessories included: Front and rear caps, soft case, lens hood
Lens Mount: Sigma, Canon, Nikon (bodies with integral AF motor), Sony, Pentax
PhotoRadar review
How much do you have to spend to get a top-class macro lens? Maybe we’re about to find out as we take a look at Sigma’s venerable 50mm f2.8...
This is a digitally-enhanced version of a macro lens that goes back to the 1990s. Rather than being a brand new full-frame ‘digital’ lens, though, it’s an old-fashioned film lens that’s made it through the APS-C ‘digital’ era and come into its own again as full-frame D-SLRs start to gain ground.
Many film lenses struggle to turn in decent-looking results when fitted to a digital camera, but not this one. Its resolution, when tested on an EOS 400D body, was excellent. There’s some slight softness at the frame edges at f2.8, but this clears up by f5.6. The centre definition is very good indeed, even at f2.8. With no visible distortion and only the faintest traces of chromatic aberration near the edges, this is an extremely good lens.
It does show its age in one respect, though. It doesn’t have Sigma’s HSM autofocus motors, so the AF proves noisy and slow, though this is to be expected to a degree with macro lenses because of the enormous focus range they have to cover. Owners of Nikon D40/D40x and D60 bodies, however, need to be aware that the Nikon version of this lens doesn’t have an integral AF motor, so they’ll be restricted to manual focus only.
The manual focus is very, very good, incidentally. It’s a direct, mechanical movement and doesn’t have the somewhat ‘disconnected’ feel of more recent lenses. There’s a clearly-marked distance scale, and depth of field markers for shooting at f32. Depth of field is a constant problem in macro photography, hence the emphasis on tiny apertures. It is noticeable, though, that diffraction effects are taking the edge off the definition even at f16, though it’s still holding up pretty well and this lens is clearly optimised as far as possible for smaller apertures. It’s one of the known trade-offs in macro photography – outright definition versus depth of field.
One other point worth mentioning is that on an APS-C digital SLR, this also makes a rather good 80mm equivalent ‘portrait’ lens. Its f2.8 maximum aperture is wider than most kit lenses at an equivalent focal length, so you can get attractive shallow depth of field effects very easily – and with decent definition at the same time.
The finish, build quality and controls are all very good, especially considering the price, and unless you’re dead set on sticking to own-brand lenses for your digital SLR, this Sigma has surely got to be near the top of your list when you go shopping for macro lenses.
Posted by Rod Lawton on Tuesday, 21st July 2009 at 01:42pm GMT.


User Reviews (0)
Add your user review