LoginRegister
LoginRegister

Not yet a member? Sign up to receive our newsletter, upload photos and write reviews. Forgot your password?

Packard Bell
Latest digital kit

promo_block1

Photography mags
New issues out now!

promo_block2
promo_block3

Watch our featured video

Teach yourself Photoshop: Part 2, Video 3

Teach yourself Photoshop: Part 2, Video 3 - Editing photos in Camera Raw

Learn the basics of photo-editing with our introduction to Adobe's image editing software.

Enter Photographer of the Year
Digital Sampler button

Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Review

Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC zoom lens
Product overview
Launch price:
£330
Launch date:
1st January 2008
PhotoRadar rating:
4
User rating:
4
3 user review(s)
Review this product now
In brief:
  • • ‘Digital-only’ superzoom for APS-C SLRs
  • • Compact design
  • • 0.45m minimum focus
  • • Internal focussing

PhotoRadar review

This is the cheapest and least well-specified of the bunch, then, but it does have one big advantage. It’s 9mm narrower and a full 22mm shorter than the other two. In fact, this lens is barely bigger than the average D-SLR’s kit lens. Indeed, if you put it alongside Nikon’s 18-55mm kit lens, for example, it’s actually a few millimetres shorter. No, you don’t get image stabilisation, but when you compare the size, weight and handling of this lens with those that do, it makes you rethink how much you want it.

The Sigma 18-200mm handles really well for a superzoom, too. These usually have fat barrels, uneven zoom movement and terrible zoom creep (where the lens slides out under its own weight if the camera is pointed downwards). The Sigma 18-200m, though, has a very neat, perfectly cylindrical shape, a very nice zoom action (with no play at all in the extending section) and no problem with zoom creep at all. There is a locking switch on the barrel to fix it at 18mm, but it’s not needed.

This lens is so well-made, so compact and handles so well that you could forgive it a few optical shortcomings. Just as well, really, because there are a couple of issues. The geometry is pretty variable, with strong barrel distortion at 18mm turning into strong pincushioning at 50mm and beyond. You should’t expect too much from the edge performance until you stop down to around f8, and the definition at 200mm is pretty grim wide open and only really picks up at f8-f11. There’s some major chromatic aberration at full zoom, too.

But all this has to be taken in context. These are the classic pitfalls with any superzoom, including makers’ own lenses which cost two or three times as much as this one. You’ve got to expect these optical flaws in any lens with this kind of zoom range. The Sigma 18-200mm maybe has them slightly worse than most, but these things are relative.

And the Sigma’s average optical performance has to be weighed against its excellent handling. Generally, for all their flexibility, superzooms are not much fun to carry around day in and day out.

This one, though, is no bigger than a kit lens and handles so sweetly you’ll readily forgive its modest shortcomings.

Verdict:
Superzooms are typically big, fat, heavy, expensive and cumbersome and suffer from significant optical shortcomings. This Sigma 18-200mm has the optical shortcomings all right, but in every other respect it bucks the trend. It’s no bigger than a kit lens and handles just as sweetly. The pictures are average, but it’s a joy to use.
PhotoRadar rating:
4
User rating:
4
3 user review(s)

User Reviews (3)

Add your user review
User rating:
4

The review above covers most of my findings though they did not mention that the focus is fairly quick and accurate. The build quality is very good and the lens feels very solid in use. C.A. is noticable at the edges when you push the lens at full zoom and taking high contrast subjects such as tree branches against the sky. I'm very happy with my lens and it has had lots of use.

#1. Posted on Wednesday, 05 Aug 2009 at 02:56pm GMT. Report this

User rating:
3

It is a very good all-around lens. excellent when travelling. one drawback I noticed is it's sharpness is soft at full focal length.

#2. Posted on Wednesday, 18 Nov 2009 at 11:00am GMT. Report this

User rating:
5

It's gotta be five stars for the value this lens delivers. Price over performance there is nothing else to touch it. I tried the Canon 18-200mm and found the both Sigma cheaper and a better performer. As an all-rounder this lens is perfect. At the wide end 18mm it is great for landscapes, at the mid 100mm excellent for portraits and it'll get you close and sharp to the wildlife or sports action at 200mm. I like the large diameter (72mm) and the rubbery, chunky feel in the hand. The OS is great and the focus fast and low noise. Brilliant! This has encouraged me to look at other Sigma lenses.

#3. Posted on Sunday, 02 May 2010 at 06:05pm GMT. Report this


Add review

Have you used this product? Tell us what you think about it here.


User login

Add review
To add a review to this page you must sign in to your PhotoRadar account. If you do not have an account you can create a new account for free and join the best online pro photographers community.