Pentax SMC DA* 16-50mm f2.8 ED AL (IF) SDM Review
Product overview
- Launch price:
- £620
- Launch date:
- 11th February 2009
- PhotoRadar rating:
- User rating:
Technical Specification
- RRP: £620
- Date released: February 2007
- Max format size: APS-C
- Focal length: 16-50mm
- 35mm equivalent focal length: 24-75mm
- Max aperture: f2.8
- Minimum aperture: f22
- Construction: 15 elements in 12 groups
- Minimum focus: 0.3m
- Diaphragm blades: 9
- AF motor type: Pentax SDM
- Image Stabilization: No
- Filter thread: 77mm
- Weight: 600g
- Dimensions: 98.5 x 84mm
- Accessories included: Front and rear caps, soft case, lens hood
- Lens Mount: Pentax D-SLR (not full-frame)
PhotoRadar review
Pro-spec cameras like the Pentax K20D need a pro-spec lens to do them justice, and the 16-50mm f2.8 makes a worthy, if expensive, alternative to the basice 18-55mm kit lens...
Pentax D-SLR camera bodies might be good, but the standard 18-55mm kit lens is distinctly patchy, with coarse autofocus, indifferent edge definition and noticeable chromatic aberration. If you want to get the best from these cameras, you need to think about a better ‘standard’ lens, and there are several in the Pentax range. This is the most expensive, a 16-50mm constant-aperture f2.8 zoom that’s one of Pentax’s elite ‘star’ lenses.
One attraction is that constant f2.8 lens aperture, which makes manual exposure adjustments easier (no need to allow for different available apertures and different focal lengths) and it allows better low-light shooting at longer focal lengths. In fact, at 50mm, this lens has a two-stop aperture advantage over a regular kit zoom. Another is the zoom range – it’s a little shorter than the average kit zoom at the long end, but usefully wider at the short end, where it’s roughly equivalent to a 24mm lens rather than the usual 28mm.
This lens also incorporates Pentax’s SDM autofocus motors, which are much smoother and quieter. Having said that, there is still some slight hesitancy with some subjects which you don’t get with Nikon or Canon cameras, say. This is more likely to be the camera and its AF sensor rather than the lens, though.
One of the principal reasons for choosing a lens like this, though, is improved optical quality, and the Pentax 16-50mm certainly delivers this, though it’s by no means perfect. There’s some fairly pronounced distortion at the 16mm end of the range, coupled with a degree of chromatic aberration. And while the definition is good at short-medium focal lengths even when the lens is wide open, it’s not quite so good at 50mm, where you need to stop down to around f5.6 or beyond to get the best results.
Realistically, you’ve got to expect some limitations, even in a premium fixed-aperture zoom like this one, and the fact is that the Pentax 16-50mm f2.8 does very well for its price. The equivalent Canon and Nikon lenses cost twice as much as this one but are no better optically and, in fact, might struggle to match this lens’s full-aperture performance and consistency across the focal range, overall.
Choosing a better ‘standard’ zoom for Pentax D-SLRs is a bit of a juggling act. There’s also a pretty good 17-70mm f4, which has a wider range than this one and costs less. But if you want to shoot in low light and get the best possible results across a range of focal lengths and apertures, this 16-50mm is almost certainly the best of the bunch.
Posted by Rod Lawton on Tuesday, 21st July 2009 at 12:15pm GMT.



User Reviews (0)
Add your user review