The advantage of AA batteries, though, is that you can buy them anywhere, so that if the Pentax does run out of power, it won't be too difficult to get replacements. Rather than using regular alkalines, though, you'd be much better off with high-powered lithium disposables. These cost more, but last many times longer.

Indeed, the K200D comes supplied with a set, and ours were still going strong even after days of intermittent testing. Pentax claims a life of 550 shots with this type of battery, which is at least as good as most of its rivals and their lithium-ion cells.

Robust design

Pentax has done well to find space for four AAs in what is actually quite a compact body. But although it's small, the Pentax is also very robust. The outside is plastic, but the camera chassis is made of stainless steel. This camera does feel notably heavier and tougher than other entry-level SLRs.

But there is also a hint of crudeness about it. The controls are all fine, but the menus use blocky text, rather unsubtle icons and garish primary colours. The control system is effective, but there's nothing subtle about it, especially when you compare it to the smart and modern-looking graphical interface on the Nikon D60, for example.

Many users won't care about that, of course, and will only be interested in how easy and logical the camera is to use, and how good the pictures are.

Hit and miss pictures

There are two types of picture quality with the K200D: what we'll call 'macroscopic' picture quality, which is what the image looks like as a whole (tone, contrast, colour, saturation and so on), and 'microscopic' picture quality (sharpness, noise, aberrations).

The K200's 'macroscopic' picture quality is very good. As with previous Pentaxes, there's a film-like look about the results, with strong mid-tone contrast that many other digital SLRs don't produce, and dense, vivid colours. 'Microscopically', it's a slightly different story.

The definition and noise levels are typical for a 10-megapixel DSLR, but the 18-55mm kit lens isn't a great performer. Definition drops off towards the edges of the frame and chromatic aberration around outlines starts to creep in. There are also traces of vignetting at the short end of the zoom range. And the coarse and noisy autofocus motor is just the last straw.

A gadget-heavy camera

Frankly, the K200D's kit lens does let it down. It's definitely worth considering a more expensive alternative and, while this does push the price up, this camera is good enough to justify it.

If you're into style, gadgets and technology, the K200D isn't for you. If, on the other hand, you want a solid, workmanlike camera with a traditional feel and film-like image quality, you should take it seriously.