Even at the lowest sensitivity (ISO 80), it's possible to see some noise mottling in blue skies, for example - and, in finely textured areas like distant vegetation, traces of the smudging and smearing that are characteristic of in-camera noise reduction.

By ISO 400, the noise is clearly visible in A4 prints, and so is the smudging effect of the noise reduction. At ISO 800, the picture quality is plummeting, and the desaturated blizzard you get at ISO 1600 is way beyond a joke. Frankly, you've got to admire Canon's audacity at including these high ISOs at all, and we levelled a similar criticism at Panasonic's 10-megapixel LX2 (reviewed in issue 54).

This noise/smudging issue dominates any analysis of image quality. For what it's worth, the exposure system is generally excellent, though the dynamic range appears somewhat limited. Colour is excellent, but the auto white balance doesn't do much to counter the cool tones of overcast days.

All this does need to be put into perspective. Looking at any 10-megapixel file at 100 per cent magnification on-screen is misleading - it's what the prints look like that counts. At A4, the G7's prints look great up to ISO 400 and deteriorate after that, which will probably be acceptable to most people.

One way or another, the G7 probably does produce the best quality you're likely to get from a compact camera with a 1/1.8-inch sensor. But its 10 million pixels don't do it any favours - it would have been interesting to see how this camera would have performed with the older 7-megapixel sensor from the G6