LoginRegister
LoginRegister

Not yet a member? Sign up to receive our newsletter, upload photos and write reviews. Forgot your password?

Packard Bell
Latest digital kit

promo_block1

Free photo frames
Download 50 here!

promo_block2

POTY 2010
Enter today!

promo_block3

PhotoRadar video

Adobe Lightroom 3: video guide

Adobe Lightroom 3: video guide

Everything you ever wanted to know about Adobe Lightroom 3 but were too afraid to ask. See the cool new sharpening, noise reduction and lens correction tools in action.

Enter Photographer of the Year

AF-S Nikkor 35mm f1.8G Review

AF-S Nikkor 35mm f1.8G
Product overview
Launch price:
£200
Launch date:
1st March 2009
PhotoRadar rating:
3
User rating:
0
0 user review(s)
Review this product now
See technical specification

Technical Specification

  • RRP: £200
  • Date released: March 2009
  • Max format size: Nikon DX
  • Focal length: 35mm
  • 35mm equivalent focal length: 50mm
  • Max aperture: f1.8
  • Minimum aperture: f22
  • Construction: 8 elements in 6 groups
  • Minimum focus: 0.3m
  • Diaphragm blades: 7
  • AF motor type: Silent Wave
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • Filter thread: 52mm
  • Weight: 70 x 52.5mm
  • Dimensions: 210g
  • Accessories included: Front and rear caps, lens hood, soft pouch
  • Lens Mount: Nikon DX: should also work with FX cameras in cropped mode.

PhotoRadar review

Zoom lenses have brought a new convenience and flexibility to photography, but they’ve also brought a few other things, unfortunately, including weight, cost, restricted maximum apertures, barrel distortion and chromatic aberration.

There are going to be quite a few old-school photographers, then, who are keen to see what this new lens can do. It’s not that cheap, admittedly, but it is light, and its fast maximum aperture should be excellent in low light and for producing a bright viewfinder image generally.

The pictures, though, don’t live up to the promise. How on earth has Nikon managed to produce a fixed focal length lens which still has chromatic aberration and barrel distortion? There’s not that much of either, to be fair, but it’s a huge disappointment to find any at all.

Or is this a case of rose-tinted glasses? Were old prime lenses really that good? A quick test with an old Pentax 28mm prime on a K20D body revealed the truth: yes they were. The Pentax lens might be 30 years old, but lines run straight as a die and there is no fringing at all.

There’s more. One of the characteristics of prime lenses is that they are slightly soft at maximum aperture and need to be stopped down a little to deliver their best sharpness. This Nikon 35mm is certainly weak when used wide open, and doesn’t start turning in decent  results until you get down to about f5.6 or f8. It’s all very well having a wide maximum aperture, but if the quality’s not that good are you really any better off than using a zoom?

The build and handling are fine. This is a very simple, straightforward lens design, so there’s never going to be much to criticise. It’s lighter than an old-fashioned prime, which is good, but the manual focus ring has the ‘disconnected’ feel of a modern autofocus lens rather than the direct mechanical gearing of an old one.

You do get Nikon’s Silent Wave AF motors, which is a good thing, not only because it makes for fast and quiet autofocus, but because it’s also compatible with Nikon’s D40/x and D60 camera bodies, which don’t have autofocus motors built in.

There’s one more disappointment, though. This is a ‘G’ lens, which means it doesn’t have aperture markings or a distance scale or, therefore, any depth of field markings. It really is a pretty weak substitute for the old prime lenses it seeks to emulate.
 

Verdict:
There are lots of ways in which traditional prime lenses are superior to modern zooms. Unfortunately, Nikon’s 35mm f1.8 fails to deliver any of them. It offers few if any optical advantages over a zoom and doesn’t match a traditional lens’s features or feel. Take a look at Nikon’s older 35mm f2 full-frame lens instead or just go on eBay.
PhotoRadar rating:
3
User rating:
0
0 user review(s)